pasobguru.blogg.se

Simply fortran target fails
Simply fortran target fails









  1. SIMPLY FORTRAN TARGET FAILS PATCH
  2. SIMPLY FORTRAN TARGET FAILS PRO
  3. SIMPLY FORTRAN TARGET FAILS VERIFICATION

In " link_sl", add /DEBUG to let Visual C++. In " compile_fortran", add ‘ /Od’ and ‘ /Zi’ parameters to enable Intel Fortran compiler to add debug symbolic information into. Go to Start -> Programs -> Abaqus -> Right click on Abaqus Command à Click on Properties

simply fortran target fails

"C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\bin\x86_amd64\vcvarsx86_amd64.bat" & "C:\Program Files (x86)\Intel\Compiler\11.0\061\fortran\Bin\intel64\ifortvars_intel64.bat" & C:\Abaqus\Commands\abq6101.bat cae || pause Go to Start -> Programs -> Abaqus -> Right click on Abaqus CAE -> Click on Properties Set up ABAQUS/CAE to run subroutines from within CAE: Make sure there are no FAIL messages (except, perhaps, internet browser).Ģ.

SIMPLY FORTRAN TARGET FAILS VERIFICATION

"C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\VC\bin\x86_amd64\vcvarsx86_amd64.bat" & "C:\Program Files (x86)\Intel\Compiler\11.0\061\fortran\Bin\intel64\ifortvars_intel64.bat" & C:\Abaqus\Commands\abq6101.bat -verify -all -logĬlick on Abaqus Verification shortcut to verify your installation. Go to Start -> Programs -> Abaqus -> Right click on Abaqus Verification à Click on Properties ifortvars_intel64.bat and vcvarsx86_amd64.bat are the two batch files that the shortcuts need. I am assuming you have ABAQUS v6.10 running on a XP-64 bit PC. With regard to OS, Abaqus will not be supporting XP any longer.ĭo the following in the order mentioned below. In my experience, the order of installation is important, particularly, if one wants to use the compiler to debug the subroutines. Do not hesitate to contact me if I can be of any help. You should also check the support site of Simulia (if you have not already done that) you may find there an answer to your question. You can also check if Abaqus has recognized your Fortran compiler by opemimg the compiler's command prompt and type : "abq6102 verify -user_std". When I want to run an analysis with subroutine support I type the command (abq6102 job= user= ) in the Fortran Compiler s command prompt.

SIMPLY FORTRAN TARGET FAILS PRO

The order of installation of the above mentioned applications is the following :Ģnd Intel Visual Fortran Compiler Pro 11.1.054 My current configuration is Abaqus 6.10-2, Visual Studio 2008 and Visula Fortran Compiler Pro 11.1.054. To be honest I have not heard this Fortran Compiler, but you should take into account that Abaqus is really picky about what compiler is used. (I don't know what _CYGWIN_ does, nor whether any other platform has the same issues.I am not replying back to your post as an Abaqus expert at all, but on the other hand I gave a lot of time and effort to get Abaqus and Fortran work together! So I can really unerstand your frustration and disappointment. Thus, I wonder whether one should use an #ifdef instead of simply reinstating the previous version. If one or more processes have the file open when the last link is removed, the link shall be removed before rename() returns, but the removal of the file contents shall be postponed until all references to the file are closed." "If the link named by the new argument exists and the file's link count becomes 0 when it is removed and no process has the file open, the space occupied by the file shall be freed and the file shall no longer be accessible. > filename_tmp, filename, xstrerror (errno))

simply fortran target fails

> gfc_fatal_error ("Can't rename module file '%s' to '%s': %s", >+ gfc_fatal_error ("Can't delete module file '%s': %s", filename, >+ if (unlink (filename) & errno != ENOENT)

simply fortran target fails

> /* Module file have changed, replace the old one.

SIMPLY FORTRAN TARGET FAILS PATCH

Patch is small and reverts to older code (which means anĪssignment is most likely not necessary), if you plan toĬontribute in the future, then having the assignment on

simply fortran target fails

Janne, is there any reason that this cannot be restored?ĭo you have a copyright assignment on file? Although the Looks like Janne removed that chunk of code in r198023. > I've attached a patch for 4.9.1 that reinstates the unlink operation that > existing file to delete it, so this bug is new with the 4.9 series. > Versions 4.8 and earlier of GNU Fortran first performed an "unlink()" on the > this operation will fail if a file of the same target name exists already > updated properly when necessary because the code to do so is simply calling > Under Win32 using GNU Fortran 4.9.0 or 4.9.1, module files (.mod) are not (In reply to Jeffrey Armstrong from comment #0)











Simply fortran target fails